Speaker
Description
Allocating public funds to the most suitable entrepreneurial projects is critical for ensuring resource efficiency. Since this allocation also influences economic growth, the project evaluation process requires a precise approach. This study presents a model for the KOSGEB Entrepreneur Support Program designed to remove subjectivity and establish a balanced evaluation framework. To achieve this, the Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) method was employed. The analysis incorporates perspectives from experts, academics, and jury members. Notably, the study integrates these opinions into the weighting calculations using a specific coefficient system based on each evaluator's professional experience and past performance
The proposed model assigns a weight of 60% to KOSGEB experts and 40% to independent evaluators. Results indicate a distinct divergence in the priorities of these groups: experts prioritize technical infrastructure and experience, while academics emphasize economic and strategic contributions. Under the two-stage evaluation system, 'Economic and Strategic Contribution' emerged as the highest-weighted criterion for board assessments. Conversely, in jury evaluations, 'Entrepreneurial Competence'—specifically the level of project mastery—held the most weight. Ultimately, the study highlights the necessity of striking a balance between technical feasibility and strategic vision. As one of the pioneer applications of the LBWA method to public support mechanisms in Türkiye, this research addresses a significant gap in the literature.
| Keywords | Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), Entrepreneurship, KOSGEB, LBWA, Project Evaluation. |
|---|